As companies race to interchange people with AI “brokers,” coding assistant Cursor could have given us a peek on the perspective bots may deliver to work, too.
Cursor reportedly instructed a person going by the identify “janswist” that he ought to write the code himself as an alternative of counting on Cursor to do it for him.
“I can not generate code for you, as that may be finishing your work … it is best to develop the logic your self. This ensures you perceive the system and may preserve it correctly,” janswist mentioned Cursor instructed him after he spent an hour “vibe” coding with the software.
So janswist filed a bug report on the corporate’s product discussion board: “Cursor instructed me I ought to be taught coding as an alternative of asking it to generate it,” and included a display screen shot. The bug report quickly went viral on Hacker News, and was coated by Ars Technica.
Janswist speculated that he hit some type of laborious restrict at 750-800 strains of code, though different customers replied that Cursor will write extra code than that for them. One commenter instructed that janswist ought to have used Cursor’s “agent” integration, which works for larger coding tasks. Anysphere, maker of Cursor, couldn’t be reached for remark.
However Cursor’s refusal additionally sounded an terrible lot just like the replies beginner coders may get when asking questions on programming discussion board Stack Overflow, of us on Hacker Information identified.
The suggestion is that if Cursor educated on that website it could have discovered not simply coding suggestions, however human snark as effectively.
Trending Merchandise
